The Great Transition: Viksit Bharat – G RAM G (2026)
From MGNREGA to G RAM G: How India Is Redesigning Rural Employment.
The landscape of rural India is undergoing its most
significant structural shift in two decades. In December 2025, the Indian
Parliament passed the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika
Mission (Gramin) Act, widely known as VB – G RAM G. Effectively
replacing the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA),
this new mission is not just a rebranding; it is a fundamental pivot from
"poverty alleviation" to "productivity-led growth."
As we enter the 2026-27 fiscal year, G RAM G stands as the centrepiece
of India's rural economic policy. Below is a deep-dive analysis of the
mission’s architecture, its controversies, and its long-term vision.
1. The Core Statutory Guarantee: 125 Days
The most visible change is the expansion of the legal
guarantee. Under the old MGNREGA framework, households were entitled to
"not less than 100 days" of work. In practice, due to software
ceilings and budget caps, 100 days often became the maximum limit.
- The
New Standard: G RAM G raises the statutory guarantee to 125 days
per rural household. This 25% increase is designed to provide a more
robust income floor for the landless poor.
- Predictability:
The Act moves away from "ad-hoc" work to a scheduled work
calendar. Households can now better plan their financial year, knowing
they have a 125-day buffer.
2. The "Agricultural Pause": Balancing Farm
& Labor
One of the most debated features of G RAM G is the Statutory
Agricultural Pause. For years, farmers complained that MGNREGA competed
with them for labour during the peak harvesting and sowing seasons, driving up
costs and causing crop delays.
- The
60-Day Window: States are now empowered to notify a "pause"
in public works for up to 60 days in a financial year. This pause
is timed to coincide with peak agricultural cycles (like the Kharif sowing
or Rabi harvest).
- The
Win-Win Logic: The government argues this ensures labour is available
for food production (preventing farm-level inflation) while ensuring the
125-day guarantee is fulfilled during the "lean" seasons when no
farm work is available.
3. The Infrastructure Stack: Four Priority Verticals
Unlike the "digging holes and filling them"
criticism often aimed at previous schemes, G RAM G is built around the Viksit
Bharat National Rural Infrastructure Stack. Every hour of labour must
contribute to one of four "durable asset" categories:
- Water
Security: Massive investment in groundwater recharge, desilting of
ponds, and micro-irrigation.
- Core
Rural Infrastructure: Building all-weather internal village roads and
digital common centers.
- Livelihood
Infrastructure: Constructing cold storage, drying yards, and cattle
sheds to help farmers move up the value chain.
- Extreme
Weather Mitigation: Special works like flood embankments and cyclone
shelters to build climate resilience.
4. The Fiscal Pivot: 60:40 Cost-Sharing
Perhaps the most controversial change is the funding model.
Under MGNREGA, the Central Government bore 100% of the unskilled wage cost.
- Cooperative
Federalism or Burden? G RAM G shifts to a 60:40 sharing ratio
(Centre 60%, State 40%) for most states. Northeastern and Himalayan states
maintain a 90:10 ratio.
- The
Rationale: The Centre argues this gives States "skin in the
game," encouraging them to monitor for fraud more strictly since
their own budgets are at stake.
- The
Risk: Fiscally strained states (like West Bengal, Bihar, or Kerala)
may struggle to provide the 40% share, potentially leading to "shadow
caps" where work is denied because the State cannot afford its
portion.
5. Technology-Driven Governance (The Digital Fortress)
G RAM G is "Digital by Design." To eliminate
"ghost workers" and middleman leakages, the mission employs a
high-tech monitoring ecosystem:
- Biometric
Authentication: Real-time attendance via Aadhaar-linked biometrics at
the worksite.
- Geospatial
Tracking: All assets are geo-tagged and monitored via satellite and
drones to ensure that a road "on paper" actually exists on the
ground.
- AI-Enabled
Audits: Artificial Intelligence is used to flag anomalies in wage
payments or suspicious clusters of work demand.
6. Summary Comparison: MGNREGA vs. G RAM G
|
Feature |
MGNREGA (Old) |
VB – G RAM G (2026) |
|
Legal Guarantee |
100 Days |
125 Days |
|
Central Funding |
100% of wages |
60% of total costs |
|
Agricultural Sync |
No formal pause |
60-day notified pause |
|
Planning Logic |
Demand-driven |
Saturation-based (Viksit Gram Plan) |
|
Asset Quality |
Variable / Often temporary |
High-durability / Stack-aligned |
7. The 2047 Vision: Livelihood over Labor
The ultimate goal of G RAM G is to make itself redundant by
2047. The mission emphasizes Ajeevika (Livelihood) by integrating with
skill development programs. The hope is that a worker who starts doing manual labour
on a G RAM G water tank will eventually be trained as a plumber or a solar
technician under the same mission’s "skilling" wing.
The Litmus Test
The success of VB – G RAM G will depend on one factor: Disbursement.
If the transition to the 60:40 model leads to wage delays or "budget
exhausted" signs at the Panchayat level, the scheme risks losing the trust
of the rural poor. However, if the digital infrastructure works and the assets
created actually boost farm productivity, G RAM G could be the engine that
drives India toward its "Viksit Bharat" (Developed India) goal.
To analyze the implementation of VB – G RAM G (Viksit
Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission), we should look at Jharkhand,
a state where the transition from MGNREGA has become a major flashpoint for
federal, fiscal, and social debate as of February 2026.
In Jharkhand, the rollout is being met with a "Dual
Reality": while the Central Government promotes it as a digital
revolution, the State Government and local activists view it as a threat to the
rural poor's "Right to Work."
1. The Political Friction: Jharkhand vs. The Centre
As of January 2026, Jharkhand Chief Minister Hemant Soren
has emerged as one of the loudest critics of G RAM G, calling the Act an "interference
with the soul of MGNREGA."
- Resolution
of Opposition: Following the lead of Karnataka and Punjab, the
Jharkhand government is considering a formal resolution in the State
Assembly to oppose the Act.
- The
Rights-Based Argument: The state argues that by removing the name of
Mahatma Gandhi and shifting to a "normative allocation" (budget
caps set by the Centre), the government has turned a legal entitlement
into a discretionary welfare scheme.
2. The 60:40 Fiscal Crisis
The most critical implementation hurdle in Jharkhand is the funding
split. Previously, the Centre paid 100% of unskilled wages. Now, Jharkhand
must bear 40% of the cost.
- The
Financial Burden: For a state with limited fiscal headroom like
Jharkhand, contributing 40% to a program that employs millions is a
massive strain.
- The
"Wait and Watch" Effect: There are reports that the state is
hesitant to sanction new works because they are unsure if their 40% share
will be available in the state treasury. This has led to a "hidden
freeze" on project approvals in several districts like Latehar and
Simdega.
3. The Digital Barrier: Biometrics & Satellite
Tracking
Jharkhand’s rural landscape—characterized by hilly terrain
and poor internet connectivity—is a tough testing ground for G RAM G’s
high-tech requirements.
- Connectivity
Gaps: The mandate for real-time biometric attendance at
worksites is causing "Loss of Work" days. Workers travel to
sites, but if the server is down or the thumbprint doesn't register, they
aren't marked present and lose their day's wage.
- Drones
& AI: While satellite monitoring is intended to prevent
"ghost projects," local panchayat leaders in Jharkhand argue
that it slows down the process. Small, vital works like individual farm
ponds are sometimes flagged as "anomalies" by AI systems that
don't understand the local topography.
4. The Livelihood Shift: "Passion" over
"Pits"
On the ground, the Central Government is pushing the "Viksit
Gram" model. In districts like Khunti, G RAM G labour is being
diverted from traditional road building to Asset Stacks:
- Lac
Cultivation Infrastructure: Laborers are being used to build sheds and
processing units for lac (a local forest product), aiming to turn workers
into small entrepreneurs.
- Water
Security: Over 60% of current projects in Jharkhand are focused on
desilting traditional Dobhas (small ponds) to combat the state's
chronic water scarcity.
Summary of Implementation Status (Jharkhand - Feb 2026)
|
Feature |
Status in Jharkhand |
Impact |
|
Wage Payments |
Transitioning to Weekly |
Improved liquidity for workers, but hampered by bank
server issues. |
|
Labour Demand |
Discouraged Worker Effect |
Workers are avoiding the scheme due to biometric failures
and "Agricultural Pauses." |
|
State Funding |
Under Severe Stress |
Potential for significant wage delays if the State's 40%
share isn't released. |
|
Protests |
High |
Massive "Mazdoor Mahapanchayats" were held on
Feb 2, 2026, demanding the return of MGNREGA. |
The "Agricultural Pause" in Jharkhand
Jharkhand has notified its first 30-day "Harvest
Pause" for the Rabi season. While this helped large farmers find labour
for harvesting, it left landless labourers without income during that month,
intensifying the debate over whether the government is "managing labour supply"
for the rich rather than helping the poor.
Please read the Press Note Details: Press Information Bureau Viksit Bharat- G RAM G Act 2025.
Regards,
Amit Raj,
Author, Learner and Trader.



Comments
Post a Comment